|
How Consumer Demand for National Newspapers has Changed in
the Last Ten Years
The tables below show out the change in the circulation of
the major UK national Daily and Sunday newspapers, comparing circulation at
the start of the 1990s with the most recent data at the end of 2001:
| Daily Newspaper Titles |
Jan-June 1990
|
July - Dec 2001
|
% Change
|
| |
Circulation (Avg per Day)
|
Circulation (Avg per Day)
|
|
| Times |
432,453
|
719,861
|
66.5%
|
| Financial Times |
291,531
|
478,535
|
64.1
|
| Daily Mail |
1,670,036
|
2,476,625
|
48.3
|
| Guardian |
430,458
|
413,674
|
(3.9)%
|
| Daily Telegraph |
1,085,787
|
1,020,889
|
(6.0)%
|
| Sun |
3,936,692
|
3,472,841
|
(11.8)%
|
| Evening Standard |
517,372
|
430,023
|
(16.9)%
|
| Daily Record |
777,434
|
597,419
|
(23.2)%
|
| The Mirror |
3,129,890
|
2,187,960
|
(30.1)%
|
| The Express |
1,561,754
|
957,574
|
(38.7)%
|
| Independent |
414,357
|
230,633
|
(44.3)%
|
|
Source: Audit Bureau of
Circulation
|
| Sunday Newspaper Titles |
Jan-June 1990
|
July - Dec 2001
|
% Change
|
| |
Circulation (Avg per Day)
|
Circulation (Avg per Day)
|
|
| Sunday Telegraph |
586,673
|
812.077
|
38.4%
|
| Mail on Sunday |
1,889,431
|
2,381,142
|
26.0
|
| Sunday Times |
1,186,667
|
1,384,233
|
16.6
|
| Observer |
566,854
|
473,521
|
(16.5)%
|
| News of the World |
5,036,019
|
4,030,283
|
(20.0)%
|
| Sunday Mirror |
2,910,867
|
1,836,413
|
(36.9)%
|
| Sunday People |
2,588,468
|
1,382,366
|
(46.6)%
|
| Sunday Express |
1,727,376
|
863,779
|
(50.0)%
|
| Sunday Sport |
451,951
|
202,938
|
(55.1)%
|
|
Source: Audit Bureau of
Circulation
|
As the tables above highlight, the majority of daily
and Sunday papers have suffered declines in circulation over the last decade.
However, there are some notable exceptions, suggesting that certain
newspapers have a much stronger understanding of key segmentation issues and
how to position a newspaper to exploit that segment.
The growth in circulation at The times has been largely due
to aggressive price cutting. News International (the owners of The Times)
began to cut the price of the paper aggressively in 1993. This pricing
strategy was intended to attract new customers who would develop loyalty to
the newspaper and continue to purchase it once the cover price was raised
towards the price levels of other "quality" newspapers. This is a
good example of a penetration pricing strategy. The
increase in newspaper circulation was not achieved without substantial cost
and The Times is still distributed at heavily discounted prices to newspaper
retailers.
The increase in circulation at the Financial Times largely
reflects expansion into European editions (including FT Deutschland - whose
circulation is now over 75,000) and discounted prices abroad. Growth at the
Sunday Telegraph is largely the result of a discount subscription scheme.
Perhaps the most intriguing change in newspaper performance
in the last ten years has been the increase in circulation of the Daily Mail
and the Mail on Sunday - both news papers operating in the mid-market
segment. The Daily Mail grew its circulation by 48% and the Mail on Sunday by
26% between January 1990 and December 2001. Compare this performance with
that of the Mail's main mid-market competitor. The Daily Express suffered a
39% decline over the same period and the Sunday Express a fall of 50%. The
Mail titles appear to have succeeded by combining some elements of quality
news and editorial with a move "downward" to include more content
elements typically found in the popular mass-market segment (such as
celebrity features). The Express titles have been hurt by the improved
quality of the Mail on one hand, and by shifts towards the mid-market segment
by mass-market tabloids. As a result, the Daily Mail now dominates the
mid-market segment, responsible for 72% of mid-market circulations compared
to 44% in 1990.
Factors behind the overall decline in national newspaper
circulation
Several factors have impacted national newspaper circulations
over the last decade. These are summarised below:
| Factor |
Comment |
| Consumer lifestyle changes |
UK consumers have greater demands upon
their time and, consequently, many consumers have less time to devote
to reading daily newspapers. |
| Emergence of new news and information
channels |
The increased penetration of Internet
access and usage, together with new Digital TV channels (several
dedicated to news) and the deregulation of UK radio market, allows
consumers to obtain "news" and information at more frequent
intervals and at a time that suits them. The Internet in particular
allows consumes to define and filter their news requirements more
closely and to obtain such information at very low / zero cost. The
ability for consumers to "personalise" news and information
is significant to daily national newspapers that have, traditionally
positioned themselves as a "one-stop-shop" for news. |
| Younger generation less likely to
purchase newspapers |
For various reasons, including the two
described above, the younger generation demonstrates significantly
less enthuisiasm for buying a daily national newspaper than older
generations. The Daily Mail Group has responded to this change by
successfully introducing a free morning newspaper (Metro) aimed at
young, time-poor commuters in UK cities who would not otherwise buy a
morning newspaper. This strategy has achieved a total UK circulation
of nearly 830,000 per day by December 2001 making Metro the UK's
sixth-largest daily newspaper. |
In the industry as a whole, whilst circulation has fallen,
the size of newspapers (measured by the number of pages) has increased along
with cover prices. it has become necesary to offer the consumer more in terms
of information and coverage - leading to more pages and an increase in the
number of "supplements".
|